IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v231y2017i3p275-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximizing safety margins in task-based design of redundant manipulators for cluttered environments

Author

Listed:
  • E. Singla
  • S. Singh
  • B. Dasgupta

Abstract

Kinematically redundant manipulators help in handling environmental constraints with extra degrees of freedom, but a large number of links may also lead to significant cumulative errors at the distal end, increasing the likelihood of collisions. The focus of this paper is to synthesize a robot with maximized tolerance to avoid potential collisions, while maneuvering in the workspace. A maximized-tolerance-based method in the design stage provides a significant margin to be utilized further during architectural planning and/or in error compensation against any joint clearance error. This is the main contribution of this paper. The strategy is applicable with even a large number of degrees of freedom. A measure, named as RoboGin , is defined both for a single configuration and for a set of configurations. Maximizing this metric over the large solution space of all robotic parameters provides an optimized design from the reliability perspective. The other requirements related to robot’s reachability at the specified task space locations (TSLs), kinematic conditioning and path connectivity are framed as constraints in the formulated optimization problem. The global solutions computed through a simulated annealing technique show significant improvements in overall safety margins even in highly cluttered environments and with a large number of links. Implementation of the proposed strategy is demonstrated through realistic cluttered environments of a power plant, for a leakage testing application.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Singla & S. Singh & B. Dasgupta, 2017. "Maximizing safety margins in task-based design of redundant manipulators for cluttered environments," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(3), pages 275-285, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:3:p:275-285
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17698332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17698332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17698332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:3:p:275-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.