IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v37y2005i1p23-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Persistent Problems Demand Consistent Solutions: Evaluating Policies to Mitigate Occupational Segregation by Gender

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon H. Mastracci

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration and Center for Urban Economic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, 412 South Peoria Street, Suite 115 (M/C 278), Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA, mastracc@uic.edu)

Abstract

This study focuses on two grant programs administered by the Women’s Bureau of the U.S. Department of Labor: the Non-Traditional Employment for Women (NEW) program and Women in Apprenticeships in Non-Traditional Occupations (WANTO). These two grant programs were created to increase the numbers of women in nontraditional fields, and this analysis seeks to determine whether they had effects on women’s participation in nontraditional occupations (NTOs): jobs where men dominate, usually blue-collar crafts and skilled trades, though not exclusively crafts and skilled trades. The study finds that WANTO and NEW substantially increased the chances that a woman obtained employment in an NTO.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon H. Mastracci, 2005. "Persistent Problems Demand Consistent Solutions: Evaluating Policies to Mitigate Occupational Segregation by Gender," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 23-38, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:37:y:2005:i:1:p:23-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/37/1/23.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:37:y:2005:i:1:p:23-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.