IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v31y2019i3p354-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No evidence for hedonic shifts to bring about more moral hypocrisy: A comment on Lindenberg et al. (2018)

Author

Listed:
  • Wojtek Przepiorka

Abstract

Lindenberg et al. report experimental evidence for the effect of hedonic shifts on subjects’ propensity to engage in moral hypocrisy. Hedonic shifts are changes in individuals’ cognitive states that can be triggered by cues in these individuals’ environments such as ambient smells. Individuals in a hedonic cognitive state aim at doing what makes them feel good. Hence, the authors hypothesize that (1) individuals who are in a bad mood and are put in a hedonic cognitive state will more often take a moral stance and (2) when asked to act morally refuse to do so, (3) especially when the costs for acting morally are high, and (4) even if the moral issue upon which they are asked to act is unrelated to the issue pertaining to the moral stance they took. The authors test these four hypotheses in two laboratory experiments and conclude that their results support these hypotheses. In this comment, I highlight design, measurement, and data analysis issues arising with the two studies that challenge this conclusion. Throughout my comment, I give some indications as to how a laboratory experiment testing these four hypotheses could be designed and conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojtek Przepiorka, 2019. "No evidence for hedonic shifts to bring about more moral hypocrisy: A comment on Lindenberg et al. (2018)," Rationality and Society, , vol. 31(3), pages 354-360, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:31:y:2019:i:3:p:354-360
    DOI: 10.1177/1043463119863061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463119863061
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1043463119863061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:31:y:2019:i:3:p:354-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.