IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v49y2021i5p635-672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balanced Budget Requirements Revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon N. Kioko
  • Michelle L. Lofton

Abstract

We test the effect of balanced budget requirements (BBRs) on budget outcomes using data published in audited financial statements. With a focus on the General Fund, we find states frequently reported deficits in their adopted budgets and relied on sizeable and favorable expenditure variances to close budget gaps before the end of the budget period. Empirical analysis shows that technical or strict BBRs procedures did not increase the likelihood that a state would report a balanced budget. We corroborate our findings using fund balance data. If technical or strict BBRs are effective, states would report higher fund balances, all else equal. Results show that states that adopted political BBRs reported lower fund balances. More importantly, the adoption of strict or technical BBRs did not lead to higher fund balances.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon N. Kioko & Michelle L. Lofton, 2021. "Balanced Budget Requirements Revisited," Public Finance Review, , vol. 49(5), pages 635-672, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:49:y:2021:i:5:p:635-672
    DOI: 10.1177/10911421211054977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10911421211054977
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10911421211054977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:49:y:2021:i:5:p:635-672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.