IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/psydev/v32y2020i1p7-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where Occidental Science Went Wrong: Failing to See Systemic Unity in Diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Jaan Valsiner

Abstract

I find the conceptual field where Oriental and Occidental perspectives in psychology meet in the analysis of borders within systems—looking at the specific mechanisms under which these borders can inhibit or enhance the exchange relations between parts within the whole. The Occidental science has selected a non-fruitful pathway to knowledge that prescribes context-free categorisation of elements instead of viewing them as parts of functioning systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaan Valsiner, 2020. "Where Occidental Science Went Wrong: Failing to See Systemic Unity in Diversity," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 32(1), pages 7-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:7-14
    DOI: 10.1177/0971333620903880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971333620903880
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971333620903880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:7-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.