IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/psydev/v26y2014i1p29-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Teachers are Always Good. Children have Flaws.’

Author

Listed:
  • Hemalatha Ganapathy-Coleman

Abstract

What do the poor in India say about the education their children are receiving? And how do they remember their own years of schooling? This cultural psychological study of parental beliefs about education explored these questions by employing participant observation, in-depth interviews, focus groups and sentence-completion tasks. The participants were 19 low-income parents from the state of Gujarat, India, with a child between 8 and 18 years of age. Results indicated that these materially impoverished parents nostalgically deified teachers, whom they often referred to as Guru , while they characterised their young student selves as playful and distracted. They upheld the sanctity of the teacher–student relationship, only occasionally criticising the schools and teachers of their childhood. Examining the personal narratives of these parents, I argue that Guru is a shared cultural concept that they have appropriated as a cultural resource for understanding their own educational experiences and reconstructing their childhood selves in acts of remembering. Upholding this ancient concept also allows them to stake a claim to their ethnocultural belonging in the present.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemalatha Ganapathy-Coleman, 2014. "‘Teachers are Always Good. Children have Flaws.’," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 26(1), pages 29-58, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:26:y:2014:i:1:p:29-58
    DOI: 10.1177/0971333613516227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971333613516227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971333613516227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:26:y:2014:i:1:p:29-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.