IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v9y2010i3p315-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desert, democracy, and consumer surplus

Author

Listed:
  • Teun J. Dekker

    (University College Maastricht-Maastricht University, The Netherlands, teun.dekker@maastrichtuniversity.nl)

Abstract

If one wishes to give individuals what they deserve, one must find some way of appraising those characteristics that render them deserving. In modern democratic societies, it seems attractive to base this appraisal on an aggregation of the valuations individuals hold of the desert bases under consideration. Some have argued that the market can provide such an appraisal. However, I argue that the market does not provide a satisfactory democratic appraisal that is relevant for desert, as it allows for the existence of net consumer surplus. Nevertheless, I submit that a procedure that does not leave any net consumer surplus would succeed where the market fails. Taking the average valuation of the individuals in society for a given desert base would meet this requirement. Hence, I claim that such a procedure can provide the satisfactory democratic appraisal that the market cannot, and can be used to give individuals what they deserve.

Suggested Citation

  • Teun J. Dekker, 2010. "Desert, democracy, and consumer surplus," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 9(3), pages 315-338, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:9:y:2010:i:3:p:315-338
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X09351959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X09351959
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X09351959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:9:y:2010:i:3:p:315-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.