IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v7y2008i3p327-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can economics rank slavery against free labor in terms of efficiency?

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence H. White

    (University of Missouri - St. Louis, USA, lwhite@umsl.edu)

Abstract

The standard allocative efficiency criteria used by economists (Pareto efficiency and Kaldor-Hicks efficiency) are fundamentally unable to rank a slave-labor system against a free-labor system. Given either set of initial property rights assignments the market can reach (or fail to reach) allocative efficiency (that is, allocate resources to their highest-valued uses), but welfare economics provides no meta-framework for ranking initial assignments. This finding underscores the limits to the usefulness of efficiency criteria: they cannot settle all questions, and unfortunately are least decisive just where the stakes are greatest (namely, where wealth effects of alternative assignments are greatest). Explicitly ethical criteria are needed to make the ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence H. White, 2008. "Can economics rank slavery against free labor in terms of efficiency?," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 7(3), pages 327-340, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:7:y:2008:i:3:p:327-340
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X08092106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X08092106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X08092106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:7:y:2008:i:3:p:327-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.