IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v52y2024i1p100-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territoriality and the Modern State: The Case of China's 1962 Land Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Wuna Reilly

Abstract

Establishing new land rules is often a central part of how a modern state is constructed and sustained. In China, a state-led territorial process resulted in a set of land rules in 1962 that demarcated rural land in accordance with the production experience spaces of acquaintance communities and granted these communities key ownership rights over a fixed territory. These rights created structural conditions that encouraged village groups to establish their own operational rules, which in turn incentivized cooperation among group members on collective production and distribution. This system thus generated “quasi-voluntary†compliance, as farmers met their tax obligations in exchange for these land rights. This article explores how the 1962 land rules evolved and their role in producing the PRC's communal-owned land system, which still formally covers almost half of China's territory and population today, and the implications for the range of possible rural land governance arrangements in modern societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wuna Reilly, 2024. "Territoriality and the Modern State: The Case of China's 1962 Land Rules," Politics & Society, , vol. 52(1), pages 100-140, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:52:y:2024:i:1:p:100-140
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292221138201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292221138201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292221138201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:52:y:2024:i:1:p:100-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.