IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v51y2023i4p493-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Creation and Withdrawal of Spaces for Participatory Governance: The Case of Village Development Committees in West Bengal, India

Author

Listed:
  • Debjani Dasgupta

    (University of Birmingham)

  • Glyn Williams

    (University of Sheffield)

Abstract

This article examines how more democratic forms of state-citizen engagement can be engineered under less than favorable political conditions, through the case of the Village Development Committees under the Left Front government in West Bengal, India. Our research shows that these Committees embodied empowered participatory governance ideals and made meaningful contributions to citizens' participation within the local state, confirming the potential for well-designed institutions to deepen democratic engagement. However, this reform's abrupt reversal indicates that leftist parties are not automatically wholehearted supporters of empowered participatory governance, and that this reform needed to be connected to a wider set of claims about the Left Front's participatory successes, in order to build its legitimacy. Our wider argument is that research should examine not only the quality of participatory spaces themselves but also their political contexts, if we are to understand how experiments in empowered participatory governance can “scale up†and become durable.

Suggested Citation

  • Debjani Dasgupta & Glyn Williams, 2023. "The Creation and Withdrawal of Spaces for Participatory Governance: The Case of Village Development Committees in West Bengal, India," Politics & Society, , vol. 51(4), pages 493-519, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:51:y:2023:i:4:p:493-519
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292221102133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292221102133
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292221102133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:51:y:2023:i:4:p:493-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.