IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v51y2023i1p66-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Can Dictators Go It Alone? Personalization and Oversight in Authoritarian Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Leber
  • Christopher Carothers
  • Matthew Reichert

Abstract

Why are some autocrats able to personalize power within their regimes while others are not? Past studies have focused on the balance of power between the autocrat and his or her supporting coalition of peer or subordinate elites, but we find that often the crucial relationship is between the autocrat and the “old guard†—retired leaders, party elders, and other elites of the outgoing generation. Using an original data set of authoritarian leadership transitions, we argue that when members of the old guard retain oversight capacity over their incoming successor, he or she is less likely to overturn power-sharing arrangements and consolidate individual power. We illustrate this argument with a case study of three leadership transitions in China between 1989 and 2012. This study’s findings advance our understanding of elite politics and intergenerational conflict in authoritarian regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Leber & Christopher Carothers & Matthew Reichert, 2023. "When Can Dictators Go It Alone? Personalization and Oversight in Authoritarian Regimes," Politics & Society, , vol. 51(1), pages 66-107, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:51:y:2023:i:1:p:66-107
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292221078661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292221078661
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292221078661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:51:y:2023:i:1:p:66-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.