IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v50y2022i2p311-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polanyi and the Peasant Question in China: State, Peasant, and Land Relations in China, 1949–Present

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Chuang

    (University of Maryland)

  • John Yasuda

    (Johns Hopkins University)

Abstract

This article applies Karl Polanyi’s concept of a double movement to the trajectory of rural state policies in China since 1949. It argues that Chinese socialism created a contradictory social contract that has fueled an ongoing struggle between state and peasantry over the surplus generated from rural land. This struggle has shaped a historical oscillation between state policies that facilitate extraction of agricultural surpluses and policies that introduce social protections in the form of household farming and revitalized collective ownership. Based on secondary sources, this article compares the arc of rural policies during the Mao era and in the transition to and during the current state capitalist period. Then, based on original interview-based and ethnographic fieldwork undertaken in rural Sichuan Province, it analyzes the current introduction of urban and agrarian capital into the rural economy, revealing dynamics of a current countermovement from state-led extraction to compromise.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Chuang & John Yasuda, 2022. "Polanyi and the Peasant Question in China: State, Peasant, and Land Relations in China, 1949–Present," Politics & Society, , vol. 50(2), pages 311-347, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:2:p:311-347
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292211032753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292211032753
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292211032753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:2:p:311-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.