IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v49y2021i2p269-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Interests, Conservative Economists, and the Expansion of Noncontributory Pensions in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Dorlach

Abstract

Since the 1990s, most Latin American countries have significantly expanded noncontributory pension programs. In explaining this wave of expansion, research has focused on the protagonism of left parties and social movements and on electoral competition, generally disregarding the roles of organized business and conservative policy experts. This article demonstrates, through a detailed analysis of Chile’s 2008 noncontributory pension reform, that conservative economists played active roles in formulating a noncontributory pension policy characterized by moderate, targeted, and “incentive-compatible†benefits and financed by the general budget. The conservative design of the program facilitated broad support from employers and private pension funds, critical for the eventual passage of the reform. The analysis illustrates the need to incorporate business interests into explanations of welfare state reforms in Latin America and the broader Global South, in particular by distinguishing the interests of employers and private providers and by focusing on their interaction with conservative policy experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Dorlach, 2021. "Business Interests, Conservative Economists, and the Expansion of Noncontributory Pensions in Latin America," Politics & Society, , vol. 49(2), pages 269-300, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:49:y:2021:i:2:p:269-300
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329220952269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329220952269
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329220952269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:49:y:2021:i:2:p:269-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.