IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v49y2021i2p235-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Power, Hegemony, and State Capitalism: Limits to China’s Global Economic Power

Author

Listed:
  • Mingtang Liu

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Kellee S. Tsai

    (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

A comparative historical perspective shows how globalization and the specificities of China’s rapid growth era limit its hegemonic potential in the twenty-first century global economy. Although state capitalism and openness to foreign capital facilitated China’s economic transformation, interactions among three forms of capital—state, private, and foreign—have produced developmental dynamics that constrain China’s capacity to assume the position of the world’s economic hegemon. These include (1) the compromised competitiveness of China’s corporate sector due to the domination of state-owned enterprises, (2) limits on the ability of Chinese firms to develop leading transnational corporations, and (3) early openness to and continued dependence on foreign capital. Moreover, the party-state’s efforts to ameliorate these constraints arouse external suspicion rather than support a Chinese-led hegemonic order based on consent and shared interests. These historically conditioned realities should temper expectations that China is converging teleologically toward a familiar hegemonic role in the international economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingtang Liu & Kellee S. Tsai, 2021. "Structural Power, Hegemony, and State Capitalism: Limits to China’s Global Economic Power," Politics & Society, , vol. 49(2), pages 235-267, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:49:y:2021:i:2:p:235-267
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329220950234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329220950234
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329220950234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:49:y:2021:i:2:p:235-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.