IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v48y2020i1p131-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real but Unequal Representation in Welfare State Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Wouter Schakel

    (Leiden University and University of Amsterdam)

  • Brian Burgoon
  • Armen Hakhverdian

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

Scholars have long debated whether welfare policymaking in industrialized democracies is responsive to citizen preferences and whether such policymaking is more responsive to rich than to poor citizens. Debate has been hampered, however, by difficulties in matching data on attitudes toward particular policies to data on changes in the generosity of actual policies. This article uses better, more targeted measures of policy change that allow more valid exploration of responsiveness for a significant range of democracies. It does so by linking multicountry and multiwave survey data on attitudes toward health, pension, and unemployment policies and data on actual policy generosity, not just spending, in these domains. The analysis reveals that attitudes correlate strongly with subsequent changes in welfare generosity in the three policy areas and that such responsiveness is much stronger for richer than for poorer citizens. Representation is likely real but also vastly unequal in the welfare politics of industrialized democracies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wouter Schakel & Brian Burgoon & Armen Hakhverdian, 2020. "Real but Unequal Representation in Welfare State Reform," Politics & Society, , vol. 48(1), pages 131-163, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:48:y:2020:i:1:p:131-163
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329219897984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329219897984
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329219897984?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eick, Gianna Maria, 2023. "Welfare Euroscepticism and Socioeconomic Status," SocArXiv cvzh5, Center for Open Science.
    2. Baccaro, Lucio & Bremer, Björn & Neimanns, Erik, 2023. "What growth strategies do citizens want? Evidence from a new survey," MPIfG Discussion Paper 23/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:48:y:2020:i:1:p:131-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.