IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v47y2019i3p395-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mamluks, Property Rights, and Economic Development: Lessons from Medieval Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Blaydes

Abstract

Secure property rights are considered a common institutional feature of rapidly growing economies. Although different property rights regimes have prevailed around the world over time, relatively little scholarship has empirically characterized the historical property rights of societies outside Western Europe. Using data from Egypt’s Mamluk Sultanate (1250–1517 CE), this article provides a detailed characterization of land tenure patterns and identifies changes to real property holdings associated with an institutional bargain between Egypt’s slave soldiers—the mamluks—and the sultan. Although agricultural land was a collective resource of the state, individual mamluks—state actors themselves—established religious endowments as a privatizing work-around to the impermissibility of transferring mamluk status to their sons. The article’s characterization of landholding patterns in medieval Egypt provides an empirical illustration of how Middle Eastern institutions differed from those in other world regions as well as an understanding for how and why regimes come under political stress as a result of their property rights institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Blaydes, 2019. "Mamluks, Property Rights, and Economic Development: Lessons from Medieval Egypt," Politics & Society, , vol. 47(3), pages 395-424, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:47:y:2019:i:3:p:395-424
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329219861756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329219861756
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329219861756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:47:y:2019:i:3:p:395-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.