IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v47y2019i1p55-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conquest and Conflict: The Colonial Roots of Maoist Violence in India

Author

Listed:
  • Ajay Verghese

    (University of California, Riverside)

  • Emmanuel Teitelbaum

    (George Washington University)

Abstract

Does colonialism have long-term effects on political stability? This question is addressed in a study of India’s Naxalite insurgency, a Maoist rebellion characterized by its left-wing proponents as having roots in the colonial period. The article highlights three mechanisms linking colonialism with contemporary Naxalite violence—land inequality, discriminatory policies toward low-caste and tribal groups, and upper-caste-dominated administrative institutions. It analyzes how the degree of British influence relates to Naxalite conflict in 589 districts from 1980 to 2011. A positive association is found between British influence and the strength of the Naxalite rebellion across all of India, within both the “Red Corridor†region and former princely states. The results are robust to a coarsened exact matching analysis and a wide array of robustness checks. The findings call into question whether the supposedly beneficial administrative and institutional legacies of colonialism can be evaluated without reference to their social costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajay Verghese & Emmanuel Teitelbaum, 2019. "Conquest and Conflict: The Colonial Roots of Maoist Violence in India," Politics & Society, , vol. 47(1), pages 55-86, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:47:y:2019:i:1:p:55-86
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329218823120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329218823120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329218823120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:47:y:2019:i:1:p:55-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.