IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v46y2018i4p485-512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Favela Governance: Nonviolent Politics in Rio de Janeiro’s Gang Territories

Author

Listed:
  • Anjuli N. Fahlberg

Abstract

Since the 1980s, when drug gangs became embedded in Rio de Janeiro’s favelas , or poor urban neighborhoods, much has been written about the violent regimes that govern these spaces. This article argues that a nonviolent political regime run by activist residents also plays a critical role in favela governance by expanding the provision of services, promoting social development, fighting for their citizenship rights, and inserting favelas into political networks across the city. This claim is based on ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2014 and 2017 in the City of God, one of Rio’s most dangerous gang-controlled neighborhoods. Paradoxically, in activists’ efforts to improve the neighborhood and fight for their rights, the nonviolent political regime in the City of God not only subverted violent politics but also helped to provide the conditions for its survival. Nevertheless, scholarship must account for nonviolent political actors in order to fully theorize favela governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Anjuli N. Fahlberg, 2018. "Rethinking Favela Governance: Nonviolent Politics in Rio de Janeiro’s Gang Territories," Politics & Society, , vol. 46(4), pages 485-512, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:4:p:485-512
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329218795851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329218795851
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329218795851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:4:p:485-512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.