IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v46y2018i2p235-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Islam and the Spirits of Capitalism: Competing Articulations of the Islamic Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Aisalkyn Botoeva

Abstract

Why has the Islamic economy, as a model of socioeconomic development, gained traction as a viable option? The existing literature suggests that the Islamic economy has been popularized by a combination of factors, including anticolonial movements, a global renewal of religiosity, and the activities of new social strata who merge piety with capitalist orientations. These approaches, however, tend to homogenize social actors, subsuming them under the overarching label of Islamism. In contrast, this article employs the lens of “intra-hegemonic struggles†to identify three competing orientations of Islamism and their manifestation in the economy. Drawing on eighteen months of fieldwork in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, it argues that this contestation motivates diverse segments of the society to create and engage in the Islamic economy, rather than any single state-driven or identity-based movement. The article synthesizes three otherwise isolated bodies of work: the political sociology of articulation, new theories of Islamism, and the concept of imaginaries from economic sociology.

Suggested Citation

  • Aisalkyn Botoeva, 2018. "Islam and the Spirits of Capitalism: Competing Articulations of the Islamic Economy," Politics & Society, , vol. 46(2), pages 235-264, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:2:p:235-264
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329218776014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329218776014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329218776014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:2:p:235-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.