IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v45y2017i2p301-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Persistence or Reversal of Fortune? Early State Inheritance and the Legacies of Colonial Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Stefan Foa

Abstract

This article assesses the relative merits of the “reversal of fortune†thesis, according to which the most politically and economically advanced polities of the precolonial era were subject to institutional reversal by European colonial powers, and the “persistence of fortune†view, according to which early advantages in state formation persisted throughout and beyond the colonial era. Discussing the respective arguments, the article offers a synthesis: the effect of early state formation on development trajectories was subject to a threshold condition. Non-European states at the highest levels of precolonial political centralization were able to resist European encroachment and engage in defensive modernization, whereas states closest to, yet just below, this threshold were the most attractive targets for colonial exploitation. Since the onset of decolonization, however, such polities have been among the first to regain independence and world patterns of state capacity are increasingly reverting to those of the precolonial era.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Stefan Foa, 2017. "Persistence or Reversal of Fortune? Early State Inheritance and the Legacies of Colonial Rule," Politics & Society, , vol. 45(2), pages 301-324, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:45:y:2017:i:2:p:301-324
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329217704431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329217704431
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329217704431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:45:y:2017:i:2:p:301-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.