IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v44y2016i1p143-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Collective Action and Individual Appropriation

Author

Listed:
  • Françoise Montambeault

    (Université de Montréal, Montréal)

  • Camille Goirand

    (Institut des Hautes Études de l’Amérique latine, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle: Paris 3, and Centre d’études et de recherches administratives, politiques et sociales, Université Lille 2)

Abstract

Examining the concept of clientelism in analysis of participatory processes, we investigate how collective and individual action are articulated in practices in the case of participatory budgeting (PB) in Recife, Brazil. We use ethnographic work to look how collective actors mobilize within the PB process in Recife and show that PB’s territorial and redistributive nature provides fertile ground for informal exchanges to be entrenched in institutional processes at the micro level. Microsocial interactions between political entrepreneurs, intermediaries, and ordinary participants in Recife participatory practice are shaped by two processes: individualization of political loyalties and territorialization of politics. These, we argue, allow informal exchanges to coexist with institutionalized forms of collective action. PB presupposes that participants engage in local struggles and introduces competition and inequalities among them, as access to resources is conditioned by their ability to mobilize and enter into informal interactions that underlie political exchanges within PB.

Suggested Citation

  • Françoise Montambeault & Camille Goirand, 2016. "Between Collective Action and Individual Appropriation," Politics & Society, , vol. 44(1), pages 143-171, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:44:y:2016:i:1:p:143-171
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329215617467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329215617467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329215617467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:44:y:2016:i:1:p:143-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.