IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v11y2007i1p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Performance of Three Weak Public Sector Banks Using Composite Rating Methoda

Author

Listed:
  • Krishna Chaitanya V.

Abstract

Till early 1990s the banking sector in India was dominated by public sector banks and with liberalization hitting Indian shores, suddenly the public sector banks found it hard to cope with the dynamic changes in industry, specially with the entry of several new private sector banks. Some public sector banks even turned negative while some maintained their dominance. In order to study the performance of the public sector banks in the post-reforms scenario, for the first time in 1999, the Government of India appointed a working group under M.S. Verma. The committee identified three public sector banks with weak health. These include: UCO bank. Indian Bank. and United Bank of India. It is exactly five years now since the report was submitted. Though these banks now turned profitable, no attempt has been made to study the financial health of these banks and how the transformation took place. The present paper is a study of these three public sector banks and their performance in the last five years (post-restructuring period). The financial soundness of these banks is measured by using composite rating method. The paper also emphasizes on the strategies adopted by each of these three banks during the last five years as a part of their internal restructuring programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Krishna Chaitanya V., 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Three Weak Public Sector Banks Using Composite Rating Methoda," Paradigm, , vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:11:y:2007:i:1:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1177/0971890720070102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971890720070102
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971890720070102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:11:y:2007:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.