IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v44y2024i1p53-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Risk Prediction with Data Collection Costs: Novel Estimation of Test Tradeoff Curves

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart G. Baker

Abstract

Background The test tradeoff curve helps investigators decide if collecting data for risk prediction is worthwhile when risk prediction is used for treatment decisions. At a given benefit-cost ratio (the number of false-positive predictions one would trade for a true positive prediction) or risk threshold (the probability of developing disease at indifference between treatment and no treatment), the test tradeoff is the minimum number of data collections per true positive to yield a positive maximum expected utility of risk prediction. For example, a test tradeoff of 3,000 invasive tests per true-positive prediction of cancer may suggest that risk prediction is not worthwhile. A test tradeoff curve plots test tradeoff versus benefit-cost ratio or risk threshold. The test tradeoff curve evaluates risk prediction at the optimal risk score cutpoint for treatment, which is the cutpoint of the risk score (the estimated risk of developing disease) that maximizes the expected utility of risk prediction when the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve is concave. Methods Previous methods for estimating the test tradeoff required grouping risk scores. Using individual risk scores, the new method estimates a concave ROC curve by constructing a concave envelope of ROC points, taking a slope-based moving average, minimizing a sum of squared errors, and connecting successive ROC points with line segments. Results The estimated concave ROC curve yields an estimated test tradeoff curve. Analyses of 2 synthetic data sets illustrate the method. Conclusion Estimating the test tradeoff curve based on individual risk scores is straightforward to implement and more appealing than previous estimation methods that required grouping risk scores. Highlights The test tradeoff curve helps investigators decide if collecting data for risk prediction is worthwhile when risk prediction is used for treatment decisions. At a given benefit-cost ratio or risk threshold, the test tradeoff is the minimum number of data collections per true positive to yield a positive maximum expected utility of risk prediction. Unlike previous estimation methods that grouped risk scores, the method uses individual risk scores to estimate a concave ROC curve, which yields an estimated test tradeoff curve.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart G. Baker, 2024. "Evaluating Risk Prediction with Data Collection Costs: Novel Estimation of Test Tradeoff Curves," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(1), pages 53-63, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:1:p:53-63
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231208673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X231208673
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X231208673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:1:p:53-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.