IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v38y2018i1_supplp44s-53s.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra J. Lee

    (Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
    Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
    Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Xiaoxue Li

    (Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
    Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Hui Huang

    (Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Marvin Zelen

    (Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA)

Abstract

Background. We present updated features to a model developed by Dana-Farber investigators within the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET). The initial model was developed to evaluate the impact of mammography screening strategies. Methods. This major update includes the incorporation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as part of the natural history of breast cancer. The updated model allows DCIS in the pre-clinical state to regress to undetectable early-stage DCIS, or to transition to invasive breast cancer, or to clinical DCIS. We summarize model assumptions for DCIS natural history and model parameters. Another new development is the derivation of analytical expressions for overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis refers to mammographic identification of breast cancer that would never have resulted in disease symptoms in the patient’s remaining lifetime (i.e., lead time longer than residual survival time). This is an inevitable consequence of early detection. Our model uniquely assesses overdiagnosis using an analytical formulation. We derive the lead time distribution resulting from the early detection of invasive breast cancer and DCIS, and formulate the analytical expression for overdiagnosis. Results. This formulation was applied to assess overdiagnosis from mammography screening. Other model updates involve implementing common model input parameters with updated treatment dissemination and effectiveness, and improved mammography performance. Lastly, the model was expanded to incorporate subgroups by breast density and molecular subtypes. Conclusions. The incorporation of DCIS and subgroups and the derivation of an overdiagnosis estimation procedure improve the model for evaluating mammography screening programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra J. Lee & Xiaoxue Li & Hui Huang & Marvin Zelen, 2018. "The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1_suppl), pages 44-53, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:1_suppl:p:44s-53s
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17741634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X17741634
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X17741634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra J. Lee & Marvin Zelen, 2008. "Mortality Modeling of Early Detection Programs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 386-395, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhihui (Amy) Liu & James A. Hanley & Olli Saarela & Nandini Dendukuri, 2015. "A Conditional Approach to Measure Mortality Reductions Due to Cancer Screening," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(3), pages 493-510, December.
    2. Elliot Lee & Mariel Lavieri & Michael Volk & Yongcai Xu, 2015. "Applying reinforcement learning techniques to detect hepatocellular carcinoma under limited screening capacity," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 363-375, September.
    3. Ester Vilaprinyo & Teresa Puig & Montserrat Rue, 2012. "Contribution of Early Detection and Adjuvant Treatments to Breast Cancer Mortality Reduction in Catalonia, Spain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, January.
    4. Ester Vilaprinyo & Carles Forné & Misericordia Carles & Maria Sala & Roger Pla & Xavier Castells & Laia Domingo & Montserrat Rue & the Interval Cancer (INCA) Study Group, 2014. "Cost-Effectiveness and Harm-Benefit Analyses of Risk-Based Screening Strategies for Breast Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:1_suppl:p:44s-53s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.