IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v29y2009i4p532-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Risk Stratification in Markov Chains with Limiting Conditional Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • David C. Chan

    (Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, dcchan@partners.org, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts)

  • Philip K. Pollett

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Queensland, Australia)

  • Milton C. Weinstein

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts)

Abstract

Background . Many clinical decisions require patient risk stratification. The authors introduce the concept of limiting conditional distributions, which describe the equilibrium proportion of surviving patients occupying each disease state in a Markov chain with death. Such distributions can quantitatively describe risk stratification. Methods . The authors first establish conditions for the existence of a positive limiting conditional distribution in a general Markov chain and describe a framework for risk stratification using the limiting conditional distribution. They then apply their framework to a clinical example of a treatment indicated for high-risk patients, first to infer the risk of patients selected for treatment in clinical trials and then to predict the outcomes of expanding treatment to other populations of risk. Results . For the general chain, a positive limiting conditional distribution exists only if patients in the earliest state have the lowest combined risk of progression or death. The authors show that in their general framework, outcomes and population risk are interchangeable. For the clinical example, they estimate that previous clinical trials have selected the upper quintile of patient risk for this treatment, but they also show that expanded treatment would weakly dominate this degree of targeted treatment, and universal treatment may be cost-effective. Conclusions . Limiting conditional distributions exist in most Markov models of progressive diseases and are well suited to represent risk stratification quantitatively. This framework can characterize patient risk in clinical trials and predict outcomes for other populations of risk.

Suggested Citation

  • David C. Chan & Philip K. Pollett & Milton C. Weinstein, 2009. "Quantitative Risk Stratification in Markov Chains with Limiting Conditional Distributions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(4), pages 532-540, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:4:p:532-540
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08330121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X08330121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X08330121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van Doorn, Erik A. & Pollett, Philip K., 2013. "Quasi-stationary distributions for discrete-state models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:4:p:532-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.