IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v28y2008i6p909-916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Procedure for Determining Whether a Simple Combination of Diagnostic Tests May Be Noninferior to the Theoretical Optimum Combination

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Jin

    (South China Normal University, School of MathematicalSciences, Guangzhou, China)

  • Ying Lu

    (University of California, San Francisco, Departmentof Radiology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and UCSF HelenDiller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, ying.lu@radiology.ucsf.edu)

Abstract

Diagnosis accuracy can be improved by combining several complementary diagnostic tests. The likelihood ratio (LR) function is the optimal combination because it achieves the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Derivation and interpretation of the LR function, however, can be complicated. Linear discriminant/logistic functions are simple but may not be optimal. In this article, the authors propose a statistical framework to determine when such linear combinations are noninferior alternatives to the LR function. They propose a nonparametric procedure to calculate LR functions and estimate the optimal area under the curve (AUC). The authors then define noninferiority of a simpler combination to the LR function with regard to the AUC of ROC curves. A bootstrap procedure is proposed to test the noninferiority. Monte Carlo simulation experiments are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods. Data from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures are used to demonstrate the procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Jin & Ying Lu, 2008. "A Procedure for Determining Whether a Simple Combination of Diagnostic Tests May Be Noninferior to the Theoretical Optimum Combination," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(6), pages 909-916, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:6:p:909-916
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08318462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X08318462
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X08318462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Hua & Lu, Ying, 2009. "The ROC region of a regression tree," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(7), pages 936-942, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:6:p:909-916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.