IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v22y2002i1_supplp38-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Expected HIV Transmission Rates on the Effectiveness and Cost of Ruling Out HIV Infection in Infants

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph M. Mrus
  • Michael S. Yi
  • Mark H. Eckman
  • Joel Tsevat

Abstract

Objective To quantify the costs and effectiveness of different strategies for ruling out HIV infection in infants born to HIV-infected mothers in the United States. Methods The authors assessed 4 different testing strategies that incorporated serial HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing with or without enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) antibody testing. Testing costs, false reassurance rates, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared for the 4 strategies. Results In HIV-exposed infants, HIV DNA PCR testing at birth, 1 month, and 4 months of age results in a false reassurance rate of 21 per million (at a 2% transmission rate). Adding an ELISA test lowers the false reassurance rate to 0.052 per million at a cost of $570,000 per additional case detected; adding another PCR lowers the false reassurance rate to 1.49 per million at a cost of $720,000 per additional case detected compared with the 3-PCR strategy. At a high transmission rate (20%), there would be substantially more erroneously negative results (false reassurance rate is 256 per million with PCR testing at birth, 1 month, and 4 months) and consequently more favorable cost-effectiveness ratios with additional testing: $47,000 per additional case detected by adding 1 ELISA test and $59,000 per additional case detected by adding an other PCR test. Conclusions False-negative HIV results after serial testing in exposed infants are rare, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of additional tests are substantial at low transmission rates. However, the false reassurance rate increases considerably with a 3-PCR strategy and additional testing becomes more cost-effective at greater transmission rates; therefore, additional testing may be warranted in infants at greater risk of infection.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph M. Mrus & Michael S. Yi & Mark H. Eckman & Joel Tsevat, 2002. "The Impact of Expected HIV Transmission Rates on the Effectiveness and Cost of Ruling Out HIV Infection in Infants," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(1_suppl), pages 38-44, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:1_suppl:p:38-44
    DOI: 10.1177/027298902237710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/027298902237710
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/027298902237710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene Litvak & Joanna E. Siegel & Stephen G. Pauker & Marc Lallemant & Harvey V. Fineberg & Milton C. Weinstein, 1997. "Whose Blood Is Safer?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(4), pages 455-463, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Hornberger & Mark Holodniy & Katherine Robertus & Michael Winnike & Erin Gibson & Eric Verhulst, 2007. "A Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Analyses in HIV/AIDS: Implications for Public Policy," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(6), pages 789-821, November.
    2. Douglas K. Owens, 2002. "Analytic Tools for Public Health Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(1_suppl), pages 3-10, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edward H. Kaplan, 1999. "Implicit Valuation of a Blood-exclusion Decision," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(2), pages 207-213, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:1_suppl:p:38-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.