IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v18y1998i1p44-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economics of Treatment for Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Neil
  • Sean D. Sullivan
  • Daniel S. Lessler

Abstract

Objectives. To define clinical outcomes and prevailing patterns of care for the initial hospitalization of infants at greatest risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); to estimate direct medical care costs associated with the initial hospitalization; and to introduce and demonstrate a simulation technique for the economic evaluation of health care technologies. Method. Clinical outcomes and usual-care algorithms were determined for infants with RDS in three birthweight categories (500-1,000 g; >1,000- 1,500 g; and >1,500 g) using literature- and expert-panel-based data. The experts were practitioners from major U.S. hospitals who were directly involved in the clinical care of such infants. Using the framework derived from the usual care patterns and outcomes, the authors developed an itemized "micro-costing" economic model to sim ulate the costs associated with the initial hospitalization of a hypothetical RDS patient. The model is computerized and dynamic; unit costs, frequencies, number of days, probabilities and population multipliers are all variable and can be modified on the basis of new information or local conditions. Aggregated unit costs are used to estimate the expected medical costs of treatment per patient. Results. Expected costs of initial hospitalization per uncomplicated surviving infant with RDS were estimated to be $101,867 for 500-1,000 g infants; $64,524 for >1,000-1,500 g infants; and $27,224 for >1,500 g infants. Incremental costs of complications among survivors were esti mated to be $22,155 (500-1,000 g); $11,041 (>1,000-1,500 g); and $2,448 (>1,500 g). Expected costs of initial hospitalization per case (including non-survivors) were $100,603; $72,353; and $28,756, respectively. Conclusions. An itemized model such as the one developed here serves as a benchmark for the economic assessment of treatment costs and utilization. Moreover, it offers a powerful tool for the prospective evaluation of new technologies or procedures designed to reduce the incidence of, severity of, and/or total hospital resource use ascribed to RDS. Key words: respiratory distress syndrome; low birthweight; technology assessment; economics; costs. (Med Decis Making 1998;18:44-51)

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Neil & Sean D. Sullivan & Daniel S. Lessler, 1998. "The Economics of Treatment for Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(1), pages 44-51, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:18:y:1998:i:1:p:44-51
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9801800111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9801800111
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9801800111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene Z. Oddone & Gregory Samsa & David B. Matchar, 1994. "Global Judgments versus Decision-model-facilitated Judgments," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 14(1), pages 19-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herrin, Jeph & Etchason, Jeff A. & Kahan, James P. & Brook, Robert H. & Ballard, David J., 1997. "Effect of panel composition on physician ratings of appropriateness of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: elucidating differences between multispecialty panel results and specialty society recommendat," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 67-81, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:18:y:1998:i:1:p:44-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.