IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v21y2006i2p180-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting ‘Strategic’ Working within Area-based and Thematic Social Inclusion Partnerships in Scotland

Author

Listed:
  • Suzi Macpherson

    (Department of Applied Social Science, University of Stirling, UK)

Abstract

Fundamental to the historical development of partnership working as an approach to managing neighbourhood regeneration has been a concern to promote ‘strategic’ working practices. However, there has been a distinct lack of conceptual clarity within both policy and practice over the meaning of ‘strategic’ working within local partnerships. This paper outlines three broad conceptual approaches to understanding ‘strategic’ working as: a plan of action, as changing organisational practices, and as multi-level organisational collaboration. Drawing on data from Social Inclusion Partnerships in Scotland the paper explores the relevance of these three approaches to strategic working to the practices of these Partnerships. The paper highlights that, contrary to a policy rhetoric promoting organisational change and collaboration, a relatively limited outputs focus has dominated regeneration practice. With pressure on SIPs to spend time-limited budgets and fill gaps in services, a tension emerges between the goals of delivering services and co-ordinating the activities of partner agencies. It is argued here that it is challenging for these localised Partnerships to try to take on both of these goals simultaneously. It is recommended that a more realistic approach is taken with regard to the potential role played by local regeneration partnerships in being ‘strategic’.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzi Macpherson, 2006. "Promoting ‘Strategic’ Working within Area-based and Thematic Social Inclusion Partnerships in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(2), pages 180-196, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:21:y:2006:i:2:p:180-196
    DOI: 10.1080/02690940600608317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02690940600608317
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02690940600608317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Mccarthy, 1999. "Urban regeneration in Scotland: An agenda for the Scottish Parliament," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 559-566.
    2. Geoff Fordham & Jo Hutchinson & Paul Foley, 1999. "Strategic Approaches to Local Regeneration: The Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 131-141.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Henderson, 2012. "An Evaluation of the Layering and Legacy of Area-based Regeneration Initiatives in England: The Case of Wolverhampton," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 1201-1227, May.
    2. John Diamond, 2001. "Managing Change or Coping with Conflict? - Mapping the Experience of a Local Regeneration Partnership," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 16(4), pages 272-285, November.
    3. Zoë Morrison, 2003. "Recognising ‘Recognition’: Social Justice and the Place of the Cultural in Social Exclusion Policy and Practice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(9), pages 1629-1649, September.
    4. Philip Allmendinger & Adam Barker, 2001. "Attitudes Towards Planning in a Devolved Scotland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 759-764.
    5. Julie MacLeavy, 2009. "(Re)Analysing Community Empowerment: Rationalities and Technologies of Government in Bristol's New Deal for Communities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(4), pages 849-875, April.
    6. Keith Jacobs, 2004. "Waterfront Redevelopment: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Policy-making Process within the Chatham Maritime Project," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 817-832, April.
    7. Andrew Smith & Tim Fox, 2007. "From 'Event-led' to 'Event-themed' Regeneration: The 2002 Commonwealth Games Legacy Programme," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(5-6), pages 1125-1143, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:21:y:2006:i:2:p:180-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.