IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v59y2022i4p593-610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organized violence 1989–2021 and drone warfare

Author

Listed:
  • Shawn Davies

    (Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University)

  • Therése Pettersson

    (Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University)

  • Magnus Öberg

    (Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University)

Abstract

This article reports on trends in organized violence, building on new data by the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP). The falling trend in fatalities stemming from organized violence in the world, observed between 2014 and 2019, was decisively reversed in 2021 as fatalities increased significantly. UCDP registered more than 119,100 deaths in organized violence in 2021, a 46% increase from the previous year. The increase was largely driven by escalating conflicts in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, and Yemen. Fatalities increased in all three categories of organized violence, despite a decrease in the number of active state-based conflicts, as well as the number of actors carrying out one-sided violence against civilians. UCDP recorded 54 state-based conflicts in 2021, a decrease by two compared to the previous year. Five of the conflicts were active at the intensity of war, the lowest number of wars since 2010. Violence in 2021 was thus concentrated to fewer but bloodier conflicts. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, have become increasingly important features of modern conflicts, and the trend in their usage is discussed in the special feature section. UAV usage has since 2019 dispersed among a significant larger number of actors, even as the downscaling in the involvement of the United States in the war on terror has led to a decrease in drone-related fatalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shawn Davies & Therése Pettersson & Magnus Öberg, 2022. "Organized violence 1989–2021 and drone warfare," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(4), pages 593-610, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:59:y:2022:i:4:p:593-610
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433221108428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433221108428
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433221108428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:59:y:2022:i:4:p:593-610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.