IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v58y2021i6p1178-1193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No paradox here? Improving theory and testing of the nuclear stability–instability paradox with synthetic counterfactuals

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Bailo

    (School of Communication, 1994University of Technology Sydney)

  • Benjamin E Goldsmith

    (School of Politics & International Relations, 170491Australian National University)

Abstract

This article contributes to both the theoretical elaboration and empirical testing of the ‘stability–instability paradox’, the proposition that while nuclear weapons deter nuclear war, they also increase conventional conflict among nuclear-armed states. Some recent research has found support for the paradox, but quantitative studies tend to pool all international dyads while qualitative and theoretical studies focus almost exclusively on the USA–USSR and India–Pakistan dyads. This article argues that existing empirical tests lack clearly relevant counterfactual cases, and are vulnerable to a number of inferential problems, including selection on the dependent variable, unintentionally biased inference, and extrapolation from irrelevant cases. The limited evidentiary base coincides with a lack of consideration of the theoretical conditions under which the paradox might apply. To address these issues this article theorizes some scope conditions for the paradox. It then applies synthetic control, a quantitative method for valid comparison when appropriate counterfactual cases are lacking, to model international conflict between India–Pakistan, China–India, and North Korea–USA, before and after nuclearization. The article finds only limited support for the paradox when considered as a general theory, or within the theorized scope conditions based on the balance of resolve and power within each dyad.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Bailo & Benjamin E Goldsmith, 2021. "No paradox here? Improving theory and testing of the nuclear stability–instability paradox with synthetic counterfactuals," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(6), pages 1178-1193, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:58:y:2021:i:6:p:1178-1193
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433211018501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433211018501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433211018501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:58:y:2021:i:6:p:1178-1193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.