IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v42y2005i2p183-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Crisis-Density Formulation for Identifying Rivalries

Author

Listed:
  • J. Joseph Hewitt

    (Department of Political Science, University of Missouri-Columbia)

Abstract

This study reports the results of a project that identifies interstate rivalries through the repeated incidence of international crises using data from the International Crisis Behavior project. Despite the existence of other rivalry data collections, a crisis-density population of rivalries has the potential for making important new contributions to this growing literature. The article discusses several justifications for this new formulation for rivalry and then presents an operational procedure for identifying interstate rivals through repeated crises. The study compares the resulting population of crisis-density rivalries to other well-known populations and discusses how attributes of the different rivalry conceptions account for the differences and similarities between the identified populations. The study finds that the crisis-density approach tends to identify rivalries that have reached higher levels of hostility and militarization. Rival relationships characterized by numerous low-level militarized disputes may be likely to qualify for enduring status with dispute-density procedures, but not under the crisis-density approach. In comparison to other populations of rivalries, however, crisis-density rivalries, especially those that are enduring, are very similar in terms of the likelihood of experiencing full-scale war.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Joseph Hewitt, 2005. "A Crisis-Density Formulation for Identifying Rivalries," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 42(2), pages 183-200, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:42:y:2005:i:2:p:183-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/42/2/183.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:42:y:2005:i:2:p:183-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.