IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v41y2004i1p103-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One-Thirteenth of a Data Point Does Not a Generalization Make: A Response to Dulić

Author

Listed:
  • Rudolph J. Rummel

Abstract

While Dulić’s article is a helpful assessment of the sources Rummel used, it fails as a test of his general democide estimation methods or as an evaluation of his democide estimate for Tito’s Yugoslavia. Aside from mistakenly generalizing from one regime to Rummel’s results for 218, Dulić ignores 39 years of Rummel’s estimates for 1949–87 to concentrate on his own estimation of what Rummel’s estimate would be for 1944–48 (12.8% of the period Rummel covered). Dulić loads his estimate with war killed and the greater democide of other factions for 1941–45, miscompares the total to the 1948 census, and thereby wrongly concludes that Rummel’s estimate for the full 1944–87 period is too high. But Dulić provides no comparative estimate of his own for the full period to show this.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudolph J. Rummel, 2004. "One-Thirteenth of a Data Point Does Not a Generalization Make: A Response to Dulić," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 41(1), pages 103-104, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:41:y:2004:i:1:p:103-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/41/1/103.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:41:y:2004:i:1:p:103-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.