IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v17y1980i4p325-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mirror Images in Americans' Perceptions of Nations and Leaders during the Iranian Hostage Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela Johnston conover

    (University of Kentucky)

  • Karen A. Mingst

    (University of Kentucky)

  • Lee Sigelman

    (University of Kentucky)

Abstract

The 'mirror image' — the tendency for citizens to attribute the opposite qualities to their own and a competitive nation — is studied through analysis of public opinion in the United States shortly after the onset of the Iranian hostage crisis in late 1979. The questions addressed in this study are (1) how quickly mirror image thinking can be activated, (2) whether mirror images apply to the leaders of nations as well as the nations them selves, (3) what types of traits play the most prominent role in mirror imagery, and (4) what factors predispose people to think in mirror image terms. Analysis reveals that mirror images were very common just one month after the seizure of the American hostages, that they were more commonly focused on the nations (Iran and the U.S.) than on the leaders of the nations (President Carter and Ayotollah Khomeini), that they Nere most often evaluative rather than simply descriptive, and, perhaps most interestingly, that they were expressed most frequently by more highly educated and more knowledgeable people. Discussion centers on the interpretation of these findings, especially the latter.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela Johnston conover & Karen A. Mingst & Lee Sigelman, 1980. "Mirror Images in Americans' Perceptions of Nations and Leaders during the Iranian Hostage Crisis," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 17(4), pages 325-337, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:17:y:1980:i:4:p:325-337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/17/4/325.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:17:y:1980:i:4:p:325-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.