IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jodeso/v33y2017i3p329-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neither Tolerance nor Forbearance: The Social Dynamics in the Face of the New Religiosity in Wollo Society

Author

Listed:
  • Muauz Gidey

    (Department of Political Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Lecturer at Wollo University, Ethiopia)

  • Abebe Zegeye

    (Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia)

Abstract

Wollo society has long been traditionally known for its unique case of dignified-symbiotic-religiosity (DSR) that characterized Ethiopia as the model of peaceful religious coexistence. After nearly 40 years of secular experience, the tremor of reformist and revivalist religious groups has begun to introduce new religiosity that pose grave challenge and at times intolerance against the traditional religiosity. Tragically, Wollo has come to bear the blunt of the revivalist intolerance, although it has not been the rare case of DSR in the mixed history of religious coexistence, accommodation, and repression. The new religiosity has appeared as a potent force defining social relations and shared experiences of Wollo society: both the public and the private lives. The shared history of the people too is not spared of revivalist victimization narratives and counter narratives: tolerance and forbearance. The demystification of religious tolerance and accommodation has tarnished the DSR of Wollo society and the 40-year-old secular establishment. The historical, social, and physical spaces have come to be symbolic embattled spaces of religious exclusivity projected to the future of new religiosity threatening to end the era of DSR of Wollo Society and the legitimacy of the secular establishment.

Suggested Citation

  • Muauz Gidey & Abebe Zegeye, 2017. "Neither Tolerance nor Forbearance: The Social Dynamics in the Face of the New Religiosity in Wollo Society," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 33(3), pages 329-351, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jodeso:v:33:y:2017:i:3:p:329-351
    DOI: 10.1177/0169796X17717002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0169796X17717002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0169796X17717002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jodeso:v:33:y:2017:i:3:p:329-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.