IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v34y1990i2p234-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Models of Responsiveness in International Negotiation

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Druckman

    (National Academy of Sciences)

  • Richard Harris

    (Cray Research, Inc.)

Abstract

Alternative models of responsiveness are evaluated for goodness of fit to moves made by negotiators in six international negotiations: five arms-control talks and one base-rights negotiation. Three models, developed originally by Stoll and McAndrew (1986), are referred to as directional (tit-for-tat), trend, and comparative reciprocity. Seven models are variants on trend and comparative reciprocity including various lags and weightings for earlier and recent moves, as well as a combined trend and comparative model. The results indicate clear support for the comparative model in all of the negotiations analyzed: Negotiators responded to the difference between moves made by themselves and others in the previous round, adjusting their next move in the direction of the other's previous move. They did not respond to a monitored trend in the other's moves. Nor did the combined trend and comparative model improve predictions over the comparative model alone. Implications are discussed for the importance of fairness in the process of negotiating, for theories of information processing in bargaining, and for the “threshold-adjustment†hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Druckman & Richard Harris, 1990. "Alternative Models of Responsiveness in International Negotiation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(2), pages 234-251, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:34:y:1990:i:2:p:234-251
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002790034002003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002790034002003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002790034002003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Druckman & Ronald Mitterhofer & Michael Filzmoser & Sabine T. Koeszegi, 2014. "Resolving Impasses in e-Negotiation: Does e-Mediation Work?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 193-210, March.
    2. Bertram Spector, 1997. "Guest Editor's Introduction: the Logic of Comparative Negotiation Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 6(5), pages 391-394, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:34:y:1990:i:2:p:234-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.