IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jjlobr/v11y2022i2p123-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Study on the Traditional and Modern Methods of Performance Appraisal in the Service Industries of Goa

Author

Listed:
  • Nigel Barreto
  • Cedric Thomas Silveira
  • Valerie Carvalho

Abstract

In today’s age and times, one wants to know as to which method will suit best for a performance appraisal. Are the traditional methods still good, or does one have to shift to the newer methods or the modern methods? Also, whether any correlation existed between the traditional forms of performance appraisal and employee promotion and the modern forms of performance appraisal and employee promotion. The study was conducted on 50 managers from different service organizations across the state of Goa. A random direct structured questionnaire was utilized wherein a personal interview was conducted. The findings were such that the highest ranked method of performance appraisal desired by the service managers was the 360-degree method followed by management by objectives (MBO) and assessment centers. A high negative correlation existed between traditional forms of performance appraisal and employee promotion and a medium positive correlation between modern forms of performance appraisal and employee promotion. This meant that although the modern forms of performance appraisal were desired by managers, they did not feel the need to use them when it came to giving promotions to the employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Nigel Barreto & Cedric Thomas Silveira & Valerie Carvalho, 2022. "Comparative Analysis Study on the Traditional and Modern Methods of Performance Appraisal in the Service Industries of Goa," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 11(2), pages 123-132, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jjlobr:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:123-132
    DOI: 10.1177/22786821221127664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22786821221127664
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22786821221127664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jjlobr:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:123-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.