IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jinter/v27y2015i1p1-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology of the Social Sciences in the Age of Complexity: Unity, Autonomy or Integration?

Author

Listed:
  • Dilip M. Nachane

    (Professor Emeritus, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.)

Abstract

The principle of ‘unity of sciences’ (comprising natural, social and human sciences) has a long history. While the term ‘unity’ lends itself to various interpretations, in recent years it is generally understood as ‘methodological unity’. In opposition to the ‘unity’ viewpoint, several social scientists have argued for the methodological autonomy of social sciences. This article attempts to analyze the reasons behind the triumph of the ‘unity’ principle around the 1960s, and how it ushered in an era of formalism in social sciences, especially economics. Dissatisfaction with formalism, in general, and Bourbakism, in particular, in recent years has prompted the search for alternative methodologies in the social sciences, with complexity theory offering much promise.JEL: A12, B41

Suggested Citation

  • Dilip M. Nachane, 2015. "Methodology of the Social Sciences in the Age of Complexity: Unity, Autonomy or Integration?," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 27(1), pages 1-32, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:27:y:2015:i:1:p:1-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jie.sagepub.com/content/27/1/1.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Unity of science; formalism; Bourbakism; integration; complexity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:27:y:2015:i:1:p:1-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.