IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jinter/v26y2014i1-2p119-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Some Bribes More Harmful than Others? Exploring the Ethics Behind Anti-bribery Laws

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth David-Barrett

    (Elizabeth David-Barrett is Research Fellow, Centre for Corporate Reputation, Said Business School, University of Oxford, and Director, Corruption and Transparency Research Centre, Kellogg College, Oxford. E-mail: liz.davidbarrett@sbs.ox.ac.uk)

Abstract

The proliferation of anti-bribery laws in recent years, particularly with the passage of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, sends a firm signal to companies that norms concerning corruption in international business have changed. With the increase in legal risk has come an increase in reputational risk. However, these laws and the cultures of enforcement around them, send conflicting messages about bribery being avoidable or indeed unethical. For example, many laws include an exemption or a defence for facilitation payments implying that such bribes are less unethical or that firms have a weaker responsibility to avoid paying them, than is the case for bribes ‘to gain a business advantage’. This article seeks to analyse whether this distinction has a basis in ethics. It suggests that some bribes are less harmful than others in terms of their direct impact. However, all bribes are harmful, because they always undermine the rule of law.JEL: K2 Regulation and Business Law

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth David-Barrett, 2014. "Are Some Bribes More Harmful than Others? Exploring the Ethics Behind Anti-bribery Laws," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 26(1-2), pages 119-144, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:26:y:2014:i:1-2:p:119-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jie.sagepub.com/content/26/1-2/119.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Law; bribery; corruption; ethics; international business; OECD;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:26:y:2014:i:1-2:p:119-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.