IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jinter/v21y2009i1p53-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Gender Discrimination: The Indian Experience and a new Index

Author

Listed:
  • Anish Kumar Mukhopadhyay

    (Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, R-1 Baishnabghata Patuli Township, Kolkata – 700094, Kolkata, India. babai25@rediffmail.com)

  • Pinaki Chakrabarti

    (Professor of Economics, University of Burdwan, India. cpinaki@gmail.com)

  • Sugata Marjit

    (RBI Professor of Industrial Economics, Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Kolkata, India. genius1in@yahoo.com)

Abstract

The problem of gender disparity exists in India as in many other developing and developed countries. There is a growing concern about the falling female-male ratio (FMR), a very important indicator of this inequality. Overall evaluation of the quality of life in the mode of averages puts little weight on the reality of a falling sex ratio. The standard gender development measures capture this inequality inadequately. The literature records a number of contradictory claims and findings on the subject. Strikingly, this falling FMR over time reflects gross deprivation of nearly fifty percent of our population and given that these deprivations are rising, the increasing value of gender development index is highly misleading, possibly concealing a deteriorating quality of life for females. The basic objective of this paper is to construct an aggregative index which will be able to resolve the problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Anish Kumar Mukhopadhyay & Pinaki Chakrabarti & Sugata Marjit, 2009. "Measuring Gender Discrimination: The Indian Experience and a new Index," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 21(1), pages 53-68, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:53-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jie.sagepub.com/content/21/1/53.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:53-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.