IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v5y1980i3p235-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity of Randomization Tests for one-Subject Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene S. Edgington

Abstract

Valid Statistical tests for one-subject experiments are necessary to justify Statistical inferences and to ensure the acceptability of research reports to a wide range of journals and readers. The validity of randomization tests for one-subject experiments is examined in this paper. A randomization test is a procedure for determining significance in the following manner. A test statistic (e.g., t or F) is computed for a set of research data. The value of the test statistic is called the “obtained test statistic value.†The data are then divided repeatedly, and the test statistic is computed for each data division. If the proportion of the data divisions giving a test statistic value as large as the obtained test statistic value is no greater than α, the test statistic is significant at the α level. Any Statistical test is said to be a randomization test when the significance of its test statistic is determined by the randomization test procedure. Determination of significance by the randomization test procedure permits the valid application of any Statistical test, whether it be as simple as a t test or as complex as factorial multivariate analysis of variance, for one-subject as well as multiple-subject experiments. For the randomization test procedure to be valid for a one-subject experiment, there must be random assignment of treatment times to treatments (i.e., random determination of when each treatment is to be given); specification, before observing the data, of the test statistic and the criterion to be employed for discarding data; and, in the determination of significance, division of the data in a manner consistent with the random assignment procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene S. Edgington, 1980. "Validity of Randomization Tests for one-Subject Experiments," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 5(3), pages 235-251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:5:y:1980:i:3:p:235-251
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986005003235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986005003235
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986005003235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:5:y:1980:i:3:p:235-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.