IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v47y2022i6p666-692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Differential Item Functioning Without Predefined Anchor Items Using Robust Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Weimeng Wang
  • Yang Liu

    (University of Maryland)

  • Hongyun Liu

    (Beijing Normal University)

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when the probability of endorsing an item differs across groups for individuals with the same latent trait level. The presence of DIF items may jeopardize the validity of an instrument; therefore, it is crucial to identify DIF items in routine operations of educational assessment. While DIF detection procedures based on item response theory (IRT) have been widely used, a majority of IRT-based DIF tests assume predefined anchor (i.e., DIF-free) items. Not only is this assumption strong, but violations to it may also lead to erroneous inferences, for example, an inflated Type I error rate. We propose a general framework to define the effect sizes of DIF without a priori knowledge of anchor items. In particular, we quantify DIF by item-specific residuals from a regression model fitted to the true item parameters in respective groups. Moreover, the null distribution of the proposed test statistic using robust estimator can be derived analytically or approximated numerically even when there is a mix of DIF and non-DIF items, which yields asymptotically justified statistical inference. The Type I error rate and the power performance of the proposed procedure are evaluated and compared with the conventional likelihood-ratio DIF tests in a Monte Carlo experiment. Our simulation study has shown promising results in controlling Type I error rate and power of detecting DIF items. Even when there is a mix of DIF and non-DIF items, the true and false alarm rate can be well controlled when a robust regression estimator is used.

Suggested Citation

  • Weimeng Wang & Yang Liu & Hongyun Liu, 2022. "Testing Differential Item Functioning Without Predefined Anchor Items Using Robust Regression," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(6), pages 666-692, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:47:y:2022:i:6:p:666-692
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986221109208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986221109208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986221109208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:47:y:2022:i:6:p:666-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.