IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v44y2019i2p180-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Linking Functions for Response Model Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle D. Barrett

    (ACT)

  • Wim J. van der Linden

    (Pacific Metrics Corporation)

Abstract

Parameter linking in item response theory is generally necessary to adjust for differences between the true values for the same item and ability parameters due to the use of different identifiability restrictions in different calibrations. The research reported in this article explores a precision-weighted (PW) approach to the problem of estimating the linking functions for the common dichotomous logistic response models. Asymptotic standard errors (ASEs) of linking for the new approach are derived and compared to those of the mean/mean and mean/sigma linking methods to which it has a superficial similarity and to the Haebara and Stocking and Lord response function methods. Empirical examples from a few recent linking studies are presented. It is demonstrated that the new approach has smaller ASE than the mean/mean and mean/sigma methods and comparable ASE to the response function methods. However, when some of the item parameters have large estimation error relative to the others, all current methods appear to violate the rather obvious requirement of monotone decrease in ASE with the number of common items in the linking design while the ASE of the PW method demonstrates monotone decrease with the number of common items. The PW method also has the benefits of simple calculation and an ASE which is additive in the contribution of each item, useful for optimal linking design. We conclude that the proposed approach to estimating linking parameters holds promise and warrants further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle D. Barrett & Wim J. van der Linden, 2019. "Estimating Linking Functions for Response Model Parameters," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(2), pages 180-209, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:44:y:2019:i:2:p:180-209
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998618808576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998618808576
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998618808576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Battauz, Michela, 2015. "equateIRT: An R Package for IRT Test Equating," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 68(i07).
    2. Wim J. Linden & Michelle D. Barrett, 2016. "Linking Item Response Model Parameters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 650-673, September.
    3. Ogasawara, Haruhiko, 2000. "Asymptotic Standard Errors of IRT Equating Coefficients Using Moments," 商学討究 (Shogaku Tokyu), Otaru University of Commerce, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Björn Andersson & Marie Wiberg, 2017. "Item Response Theory Observed-Score Kernel Equating," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 48-66, March.
    2. Michela Battauz, 2017. "Multiple Equating of Separate IRT Calibrations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 610-636, September.
    3. Michela Battauz, 2019. "On Wald tests for differential item functioning detection," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(1), pages 103-118, March.
    4. Ogasawara, Haruhiko, 2010. "Asymptotic expansions for the pivots using log-likelihood derivatives with an application in item response theory," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(9), pages 2149-2167, October.
    5. Haruhiko Ogasawara, 2003. "Asymptotic standard errors of irt observed-score equating methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 193-211, June.
    6. Leah M. Feuerstahler, 2019. "Metric Transformations and the Filtered Monotonic Polynomial Item Response Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 105-123, March.
    7. Michela Battauz, 2023. "Testing for differences in chain equating," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(2), pages 134-145, May.
    8. Michela Battauz, 2013. "IRT Test Equating in Complex Linkage Plans," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 464-480, July.
    9. Michela Battauz, 2015. "Factors affecting the variability of IRT equating coefficients," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 69(2), pages 85-101, May.
    10. Haruhiko Ogasawara, 2021. "Maximization of Some Types of Information for Unidentified Item Response Models with Guessing Parameters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 544-563, June.
    11. John Patrick Lalor & Pedro Rodriguez, 2023. "py-irt : A Scalable Item Response Theory Library for Python," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 5-13, January.
    12. Battauz, Michela, 2015. "equateIRT: An R Package for IRT Test Equating," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 68(i07).
    13. Hao Wu, 2016. "A Note on the Identifiability of Fixed-Effect 3PL Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1093-1097, December.
    14. Stefano Noventa & Andrea Spoto & Jürgen Heller & Augustin Kelava, 2019. "On a Generalization of Local Independence in Item Response Theory Based on Knowledge Space Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 395-421, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:44:y:2019:i:2:p:180-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.