IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v43y2018i4p407-439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Equivalence Testing Approaches for Mantel–Haenszel DIF Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jodi M. Casabianca

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

  • Charles Lewis

    (Fordham University)

Abstract

The null hypothesis test used in differential item functioning (DIF) detection tests for a subgroup difference in item-level performance—if the null hypothesis of “no DIF†is rejected, the item is flagged for DIF. Conversely, an item is kept in the test form if there is insufficient evidence of DIF. We present frequentist and empirical Bayes approaches for implementing statistical equivalence testing for DIF using the Mantel–Haenszel (MH) DIF statistic. With these approaches, rejection of the null hypothesis of “DIF†allows the conclusion of statistical equivalence, a more stringent criterion for keeping items. In other words, the roles of the null and alternative hypotheses are interchanged in order to have positive evidence that the DIF of an item is small. A simulation study compares the equivalence testing approaches to the traditional MH DIF detection method with the Educational Testing Service classification system. We illustrate the methods with item response data from the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jodi M. Casabianca & Charles Lewis, 2018. "Statistical Equivalence Testing Approaches for Mantel–Haenszel DIF Analysis," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(4), pages 407-439, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:43:y:2018:i:4:p:407-439
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998617742410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998617742410
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998617742410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:43:y:2018:i:4:p:407-439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.