IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v3y1978i2p145-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests for Equality of Correlated Proportions in a Polychotomous Response Design

Author

Listed:
  • Barry M. Katz

Abstract

This paper surveys available techniques and introduces an explicit statement of a new statistic to test for equality of correlated proportions in a polychotomous response design. The statistic does not require use of general linear models methodology, but it is an explicit, special case of methodology implicit in Bhapkar (1966) , Grizzle, Starmer, and Koch (1969) and Koch and Reinfurt (1971) . The large-sample distribution for the test statistic is derived as well as computational formulas for calculating the statistic. Associated post hoc procedures are also developed. A conservative, modified form of the statistic is constructed, and an empirical investigation of the small sample behavior of both statistics is carried out via Monte Carlo sampling. A set of guidelines for the potential user of the techniques is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Barry M. Katz, 1978. "Tests for Equality of Correlated Proportions in a Polychotomous Response Design," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 3(2), pages 145-178, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:3:y:1978:i:2:p:145-178
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986003002145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986003002145
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986003002145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:3:y:1978:i:2:p:145-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.