IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v33y2008i2p186-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Results on the Linear Equating Methods for the Non-Equivalent-Groups Design

Author

Listed:
  • Alina A. von Davier

Abstract

The two most common observed-score equating functions are the linear and equipercentile functions. These are often seen as different methods, but von Davier, Holland, and Thayer showed that any equipercentile equating function can be decomposed into linear and nonlinear parts. They emphasized the dominant role of the linear part of the nonlinear equating function and gave conditions under which the equipercentile methods in the non-equivalent-groups anchor test (NEAT) design give identical results. Consequently, this article focuses on linear equating methods in a NEAT design—the Tucker, chained, and Levine observed-score functions—and describes the theoretical conditions under which these methods produce the same equating function. Constructed examples illustrate the theoretical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina A. von Davier, 2008. "New Results on the Linear Equating Methods for the Non-Equivalent-Groups Design," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 33(2), pages 186-203, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:33:y:2008:i:2:p:186-203
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998607302633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998607302633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998607302633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:33:y:2008:i:2:p:186-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.