IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v28y2003i4p315-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Probability Index of the Robustness of a Causal Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Pan
  • Kenneth A. Frank

Abstract

Causal inference is an important, controversial topic in the social sciences, where it is difficult to conduct experiments or measure and control for all confounding variables. To address this concern, the present study presents a probability index to assess the robustness of a causal inference to the impact of a confounding variable. The information from existing covariates is used to develop a reference distribution for gauging the likelihood of observing a given value of the impact of a confounding variable. Applications are illustrated with an empirical example pertaining to educational attainment. The methodology discussed in this study allows for multiple partial causes in the complex social phenomena that we study, and informs the controversy about causal inference that arises from the use of statistical models in the social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Pan & Kenneth A. Frank, 2003. "A Probability Index of the Robustness of a Causal Inference," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 28(4), pages 315-337, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:28:y:2003:i:4:p:315-337
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986028004315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986028004315
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986028004315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesse Y. Hsu & Dylan S. Small, 2013. "Calibrating Sensitivity Analyses to Observed Covariates in Observational Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 803-811, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:28:y:2003:i:4:p:315-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.