IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v17y1992i1p27-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Minimally Important Difference Significant Criterion for Sample Size

Author

Listed:
  • Richard J. Harris
  • Dana Quade

Abstract

For a wide range of tests of single-df hypotheses, the sample size needed to achieve 50% power is readily approximated by setting N such that a significance test conducted on data that fit one’s assumptions perfectly just barely achieves statistical significance at one’s chosen alpha level. If the effect size assumed in establishing one’s N is the minimally important effect size (i.e., that effect size such that population differences or correlations smaller than that are not of any practical or theoretical significance, whether statistically significant or not), then 50% power is optimal, because the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis should be greater than .5 when the population difference is of practical or theoretical significance but lower than .5 when it is not. Moreover, the actual power of the test in this case will be considerably higher than .5, exceeding .95 for a population difference two or more times as large as the minimally important difference (MID). This minimally important difference significant (MIDS) criterion extends naturally to specific comparisons following (or substituting for) overall tests such as the ANOVA F and chi-square for contingency tables, although the power of the overall test (i.e., the probability of finding some statistically significant specific comparison) is considerably greater than .5 when the MIDS criterion is applied to the overall test. However, the proper focus for power computations is one or more specific comparisons (rather than the omnibus test), and the MIDS criterion is well suited to setting sample size on this basis. Whereas N mids (the sample size specified by the MIDS criterion) is much too small for the case in which we wish to prove the modified H 0 that there is no important population effect, it nonetheless provides a useful metric for specifying the necessary sample size. In particular, the sample size needed to have a 1 – α probability that the (1 − α)-level confidence interval around one’s population parameter includes no important departure from H 0 is four times N mids when H 0 is true and approximately [4/(1 – b) 2 ].N MIDS when b (the ratio between the actual population difference and the minimally important difference) is between zero and unity. The MIDS criterion for sample size provides a useful alternative to the methods currently most commonly employed and taught.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard J. Harris & Dana Quade, 1992. "The Minimally Important Difference Significant Criterion for Sample Size," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 17(1), pages 27-49, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:17:y:1992:i:1:p:27-49
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986017001027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986017001027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986017001027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    power; sample size;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:17:y:1992:i:1:p:27-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.