IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v57y2020i1p51-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why BRICS Is No Threat to the Post-war Liberal World Order

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Nuruzzaman

Abstract

BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) has emerged as a powerful economic group in the global economy and politics, apparently posing threats to the survival of the post-war liberal world order. Its member states (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) are seeking to democratize the post-war liberal world order to increase their shares of voting power in the decision-making processes of the Bretton Woods institutions and thus curb the USA’s dominance over global economic and financial architecture and eventually overhaul the US-led liberal world order. Contrary to the fear of many Western policymakers and analysts, this article contends that BRICS poses no credible threats to the US-led post-war order. The BRICS group’s potential to challenge or threaten the US-led world order is seriously undermined by the internal make-up of the group, its political and ideological heterogeneity, its incapacity to develop a collective world order vision salable to the wider international community and the lack of strong convergence in foreign policy goals and preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Nuruzzaman, 2020. "Why BRICS Is No Threat to the Post-war Liberal World Order," International Studies, , vol. 57(1), pages 51-66, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:57:y:2020:i:1:p:51-66
    DOI: 10.1177/0020881719884449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020881719884449
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020881719884449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramesh Thakur, 2014. "How representative are ?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1791-1808, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigo Fracalossi de Moraes, 2020. "Whither Security Cooperation in the BRICS? Between the Protection of Norms and Domestic Politics Dynamics," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 439-447, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolijn van Noort, 2017. "Study of Strategic Narratives: The Case of BRICS," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 121-129.
    2. Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2021. "The BRICS Countries’ Bilateral Economic Relations, 2009 to 2019: Between Rhetoric and Reality," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Francesco Petrone, 2021. "BRICS and Global Governance: Will the Grouping be able to Reform the United Nations Security Council?," International Studies, , vol. 58(3), pages 363-379, July.
    4. Rodrigo Fracalossi de Moraes, 2020. "Whither Security Cooperation in the BRICS? Between the Protection of Norms and Domestic Politics Dynamics," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 439-447, September.
    5. Francesco Petrone, 2020. "What If Soft Power Becomes the New Weapon for World Leadership? Considerations on the Debate in Relation to the New World Order," Proceedings of the 17th International RAIS Conference, June 1-2, 2020 020fp, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    6. Gonca Oguz Gok & Mehmet Sahin Gok, 2016. "Emerging Economies: Comparative Analysis of MIST and IBSA Countries," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:57:y:2020:i:1:p:51-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.