IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v43y2020i4p370-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Mixed Multicriteria Decision-making Methods to Determine the Optimal Development Industries for the Taoyuan Aerotropolis, Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Yuan Chang
  • Yin-Hao Chiu
  • Jung-Wei Wang

Abstract

The study explored both the development policy of regional industry and the aerotropolis as an empirical object. In planning an aerotropolis, governments should account for both regional and industrial characteristics to establish appropriate policies for promoting industrial development that maximizes the benefits of invested resources. In this study, a composite multicriteria decision-making method was used to filter the optimal aerotropolis industry evaluation index through the fuzzy Delphi method. Subsequently, the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory–based analytic network process was used to obtain the influence relations and weights between the indexes to establish an optimal industry plan. Satisfaction evaluation was then used to calculate the performance values of the programs and discover the optimal industries for the city to provide the government with a policy reference. This study found that the technical environment, product and industry networks, and basic environment were the most important aspects of the Taoyuan Aerotropolis. Aviation linkage and logistics services had the highest performance among industries, identifying them as the most suitable supplementary developments to the aviation industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Yuan Chang & Yin-Hao Chiu & Jung-Wei Wang, 2020. "Application of Mixed Multicriteria Decision-making Methods to Determine the Optimal Development Industries for the Taoyuan Aerotropolis, Taiwan," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(4), pages 370-396, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:43:y:2020:i:4:p:370-396
    DOI: 10.1177/0160017619849617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0160017619849617
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0160017619849617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:43:y:2020:i:4:p:370-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.